Coding
Krutika P. B.
Feb, 2026
Copy-Paste Feels Like Progress
Copy-paste is seductive.
It’s fast.
It works instantly.
It avoids thinking.
And that’s exactly why it’s dangerous.
Copy-paste coding trades short-term speed for long-term pain.
Because it:
Solves the immediate problem
Avoids understanding the system
Reduces mental effort
Feels productive
But software doesn’t care how fast you wrote it —
It cares how hard it is to change later.
Fix one bug.
Miss five copied versions.
Now bugs become whack-a-mole.
Copied logic slowly diverges:
Small tweaks
Different edge cases
Forgotten updates
Now the system behaves differently in places that should be identical.
No one knows:
Which copy is correct
Why the code exists
What can be safely changed
The system becomes fragile by default.
Copy-paste usually signals:
Poor abstractions
Missing shared logic
Unclear ownership
Time pressure
Lack of confidence in refactoring
Fixing the symptom without fixing the cause doesn’t help.
Yes — sometimes it’s okay.
One-time scripts
Experiments
Temporary prototypes
Early exploration
The danger begins when temporary code becomes permanent.
Instead of copying code, engineers ask:
What is the responsibility here?
What varies and what stays the same?
Where should this logic live?
Who owns this behavior?
Abstraction is not about reuse —
It’s about clarity and control.
Bad reuse:
Shared code nobody understands
Tight coupling everywhere
Fear of change
Good reuse:
Clear boundaries
Explicit contracts
Isolated responsibilities
Copy-paste avoids coupling today —
But creates chaos tomorrow.
Slow down before duplicating
Extract meaning, not lines
Refactor after confirmation
Name things clearly
Design for change, not speed
Copy-paste doesn’t save time.
It borrows it from the future — with interest.
Engineers don’t eliminate duplication to look smart.
They do it to make systems survivable.